Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:26 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:26 AM
NCT ID:
NCT05848193
Brief Summary:
Patients with concussion symptoms are asked by their doctors to stretch, exercise, and practice mindfulness daily. Patients can have a hard time sticking to these activities, which can cause patients to feel symptoms for longer than if they stuck to the doctor's suggestions. Many areas of medicine are now using mobile health (mHealth) technology, such as phone applications, to help patients with their treatment plans. No study has looked at the use of phone applications in general population adults with a concussion. This study will look at patient symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction with care between two groups of patients. Patients will be randomly placed into either the group that gets standard care or the group that will use the smartphone application. The investigators will compare changes in symptoms and quality of life, as well as satisfaction with care, 1 and 3 months after the patient's first visit with their doctor. The investigators hope this study helps to guide the use of mHealth technology in the treatment of post-concussion symptoms.
Detailed Description:
The proper development of mHealth technology requires the completion of 5 phases as outlined by The Center for eHealth Research and Disease Management. Dr. Perera and his research team have accomplished the first three stages (contextual inquiry, value specification and design); the proposed study will support the completion of phase four (operationalization - the integration of the application into practice) and five (summative evaluation). Using the proposed randomized controlled trial, the investigators will evaluate the use of MyHeadHealth in the rehabilitation of PCS as compared to SOC. While research on the integration of mHealth technology in other health specialties has been beneficial for diagnostic and clinical decision making, behavior change, digital therapeutics and delivering educational content to patients,18 there is a paucity of research in PCS. To properly evaluate the use of mHealth technology in the rehabilitation of PCS, a methodologically robust study directly comparing this new technology to SOC is required. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical use of MyHeadHealth to treat adult PCS patients. The primary objective of this study is to determine if MyHeadHealth significantly improves patient symptomology when compared to standard of care (SOC). The secondary objective of this study is to understand if MyHeadHealth has a significant effect on treatment compliance, QOL and satisfaction with care as compared to SOC. A sub-group analysis within this study will explore the relationship between self-efficacy and treatment compliance in adult PCS patients.
Patients will be introduced to the study during their consultation with Dr. Perera; if interested, the patient will speak to a research team member and consent to participate. Following consent they will be randomized into their study group and complete the baseline questionnaires. Patients will complete treatment as outlined by their physician. They will be contacted to complete questionnaires at 1 and 3 months following their consultation. Communication will occur via email or mail, depending on how the patient wished to be contacted.
The primary outcome of this study is symptomology. The secondary outcome measures are quality of life, satisfaction with care, self efficacy and treatment compliance.
Data analysis will focus on how the use of MyHeadHealth impacted patient compliance and concomitantly, how that impacted symptoms, quality of life and satisfaction with care. The investigators will also look at the difference in self-efficacy between groups and how that impacted the outcome measures. Within group analyses will also be performed to understand changes within the control and intervention group.
Study:
NCT05848193
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT05848193