Description Module

Description Module

The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.

Description Module path is as follows:

Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module

Description Module


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:52 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:52 PM
NCT ID: NCT07192159
Brief Summary: This multicenter prospective study aims to evaluate the correlation between quantitative ultrasound fat fraction (USFF) and MRI-PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) for liver fat quantification in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The study will compare the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ultrasound imaging against MRI-PDFF as the reference standard.
Detailed Description: Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a common liver disease requiring accurate assessment for treatment planning and monitoring. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard, it is invasive with potential complications. MRI-PDFF has emerged as an accurate non-invasive method, but it is expensive and has limited accessibility. Quantitative ultrasound techniques using RF data have been developed to provide objective liver fat assessment. Objective: To prospectively evaluate the correlation between quantitative ultrasound-derived fat fraction (DeepUSFF) and MRI-PDFF in patients with suspected MASLD across different ethnicities and varying degrees of hepatic steatosis. Methods: This prospective multicenter study will recruit 62 patients (31 from each participating center) suspected of having MASLD. All participants will undergo both quantitative ultrasound examination and non-contrast liver MRI within one week. The primary endpoint is the correlation coefficient between ultrasound fat fraction and MRI-PDFF. Secondary endpoints include diagnostic accuracy metrics and inter-observer reproducibility.
Study: NCT07192159
Study Brief:
Protocol Section: NCT07192159