Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:53 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:53 PM
NCT ID:
NCT07080892
Brief Summary:
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often results in significant postoperative pain, which can hinder recovery despite advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques. Traditional pain management methods like femoral nerve blocks may impair motor function, delaying rehabilitation. The iPACK block, targeting the posterior knee without affecting motor control, offers a promising alternative. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two iPACK block approaches-proximal (at the distal femoral shaft) and distal (between the femoral condyles)-in managing postoperative pain in TKA patients. In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with 120 participants, pain scores, opioid use, and time to rescue analgesia will be assessed. The hypothesis is that the distal iPACK block provides superior pain relief, potentially improving patient outcomes and recovery.
Detailed Description:
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures in modern medicine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge and a key factor influencing time to mobilization, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Commonly used analgesic techniques, such as femoral nerve blocks or epidural analgesia, while effective, can impair motor function and thus delay rehabilitation.
To minimize motor deficits while still providing effective pain relief, newer regional anesthesia techniques have been introduced into clinical practice. One such technique is the iPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee), which targets the posterior knee - an area often insufficiently covered by conventional nerve blocks. This method involves administering a local anesthetic into the space between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee joint, offering analgesia without significant motor impairment.
Originally, the iPACK block was described as being performed at the level of the distal femoral shaft, several centimeters above the femoral condyles. Recently, however, a more distal variation of the technique has emerged, where the anesthetic is injected directly between the femoral condyles. This may provide more effective coverage of the posterior knee capsule's innervation. To date, there are no randomized trials that directly compare the efficacy of the distal and proximal iPACK approaches in terms of postoperative pain as the primary outcome.
Our aim is to conduct a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of the distal and proximal iPACK blocks in patients undergoing TKA. A total of 120 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups.
* In the proximal iPACK group, participants will receive 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline (1:200,000), injected at the level of the distal femoral shaft (a straight portion of the femur without the condyles).
* In the distal iPACK group, the same volume and concentration of anesthetic will be injected at the most distal part of the thigh, between the femoral condyles.
All participants, regardless of group assignment, will also receive an adductor canal block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine without adrenaline. In addition, all patients will receive standard analgesic therapy consisting of paracetamol (1 g IV every 8 hours) and diclofenac (75 mg IV every 12 hours). If necessary, rescue opioid doses will be available according to individual needs.
The efficacy of each approach will be assessed using several parameters: pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both at rest and during active knee movement (up to 45 degrees) at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption within 24 hours and time to first opioid rescue dose.
The hypothesis of our study is that the distal iPACK approach will provide more effective postoperative pain control compared to the original proximal technique. If confirmed, the findings could influence perioperative pain management protocols for TKA, support the broader adoption of the distal iPACK block in clinical practice, enhance patient comfort, reduce opioid use, promote earlier mobilization, and potentially shorten hospital stays.
Study:
NCT07080892
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07080892