Description Module

Description Module

The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.

Description Module path is as follows:

Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module

Description Module


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:31 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:31 PM
NCT ID: NCT03956966
Brief Summary: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum block using Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine- Dexamethasone in providing analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Because postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is complex, specialists suggest that effective analgesic treatment should be a multimodal support. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a new abdominal truncal block for controlling somatic pain in both the upper and lower abdomen. Dexamethasone, through its anti-inflammatory and blocking effects on neural discharge, and nociceptor C fibers transmission could be used as a local anesthetic adjuvant.
Detailed Description: The patients were randomly allocated into three groups each contains (30) patient. Control group (C) received bilateral ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block using (20 ml 0.9% normal saline + 1mL 0.9% normal saline) in each side ,Bupivacaine group (B) received bilateral quadratus lumborum block using (20 ml Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.25% + 1mL 0.9% normal saline) in each side and Dexamethasone-Bupivacaine group (D) received bilateral quadratus lumborum block using (20 ml Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.25% + 1 mL dexamethasone "4mg") in each side. The following variables: heart Rate, mean arterial Blood Pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, visual analogue pain scale , time to first analgesic request, total Analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours, patient satisfaction and complications were Recorded and compared between groups.
Study: NCT03956966
Study Brief:
Protocol Section: NCT03956966