Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:10 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 11:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02367560
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-06-24
First Post:
2015-01-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Calcific Tendinitis: Comparing Minimally Invasive Modalities
Sponsor:
Lakehead University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Calcific Tendinitis: Comparing Minimally Invasive Modalities
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Calcific tendinitis is a common and challenging problem in the orthopedic surgeon's office. The chronic and variable course of the condition can lead to dissatisfaction with conservative management. Current standard of care at the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre is referral for treatment by either needle decompression therapy by a radiologist or shockwave therapy by a physiotherapist. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of these treatment options.
Detailed Description:
Calcific tendinitis is a common and challenging problem in the orthopedic surgeon's office. The chronic and variable course of the condition can lead to dissatisfaction with conservative management. Current guidelines recommend conservative management initially and failing this, a variety of minimally invasive options exist. These include subacromial steroid injection (SSI), needle decompression (ND), and Shock wave therapy (SWT).
Few trials of these methods exist, but generally a benefit is seen with all minimally invasive methods. Most promising results have occurred with needle decompression and shockwave therapy. To date, no direct trials comparing SWT and ND have been published.
The purpose of this trial is to preliminarily establish the comparative efficacies of NDSSI and SWT using a number of outcome measures. Secondarily, the investigators aim to determine prognostic factors for success of minimally invasive therapies. The results of this study will serve as a foundation for more rigorous trials in this area.
Few trials of these methods exist, but generally a benefit is seen with all minimally invasive methods. Most promising results have occurred with needle decompression and shockwave therapy. To date, no direct trials comparing SWT and ND have been published.
The purpose of this trial is to preliminarily establish the comparative efficacies of NDSSI and SWT using a number of outcome measures. Secondarily, the investigators aim to determine prognostic factors for success of minimally invasive therapies. The results of this study will serve as a foundation for more rigorous trials in this area.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: