Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:16 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-07 @ 9:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04243460
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-01-28
First Post:
2020-01-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on the Bone Level Around Implants
Sponsor:
Akademicka Poliklinika Stomatologiczna
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on the Marginal Bone Level Around Implants in Esthetic Zone: 1 Year Randomized Control Trail
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Healthy soft tissue around the implant are considered as a biological seal to prevent inflammatory periimplant diseases and ensure healthy, stable and long-term survival of a dental implant. Due to the fact that the measurement methods in the literature differ, it is necessary to establish objective measurement method and to determine the minimum amount of tissue thickness to maintain a stable level of bone around the implant.
Detailed Description:
Healthy soft tissue around the implant are considered as a biological seal to prevent inflammatory periimplant diseases and ensure healthy, stable and long-term survival of a dental implant. Due to the fact that the measurement methods in the literature differ, it is necessary to establish objective measurement method and to determine the minimum amount of tissue thickness to maintain a stable level of bone around the implant.
Purpose:
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of soft tissues in the implant area on the marginal bone level loss in the implant area and to define of the critical gingival thickness to minimize marginal bone level (MBL) loss.
Materials and methods:
75 bone level implants (Conelog® Camlog, Switzerland) were inserted in the aesthetic area. Thickening of soft tissues was performed both before and after implantation (group II and III), CTG and XCM were used (subgroup a and b). 12 months after the loading with final restoration, the thickness of soft tissues in the implant area was examined with ultrasonography (USG) device (Pirop®, Echoson, Poland), and each implant was subjected to Radiovisiography (RVG) RVG examination, where MBL loss was determined.
Purpose:
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of soft tissues in the implant area on the marginal bone level loss in the implant area and to define of the critical gingival thickness to minimize marginal bone level (MBL) loss.
Materials and methods:
75 bone level implants (Conelog® Camlog, Switzerland) were inserted in the aesthetic area. Thickening of soft tissues was performed both before and after implantation (group II and III), CTG and XCM were used (subgroup a and b). 12 months after the loading with final restoration, the thickness of soft tissues in the implant area was examined with ultrasonography (USG) device (Pirop®, Echoson, Poland), and each implant was subjected to Radiovisiography (RVG) RVG examination, where MBL loss was determined.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: