Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:28 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 5:59 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02965534
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-02-28
First Post:
2016-11-14
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Evaluation of a Night Spectacle Correction Concerning an Improvement of Mesopic Vision Quality
Sponsor:
University of Applied Sciences Jena
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of a Night Spectacle Correction Concerning an Improvement of Mesopic Vision Quality
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Reduced quality of vision and glare in twilight or night are frequently mentioned complaints within the optometric examination. A reason for these problems could be a myopic refractive shift in dark light conditions, commonly known as night myopia or twilight myopia.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether quality of vision in twilight or night could be improved by a spectacle correction optimized for mesopic light conditions. Moreover, objective refraction in large pupils measured by aberrometry was compared to subjective mesopic refraction.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether quality of vision in twilight or night could be improved by a spectacle correction optimized for mesopic light conditions. Moreover, objective refraction in large pupils measured by aberrometry was compared to subjective mesopic refraction.
Detailed Description:
After obtaining informed consent, aberrometry was performed in a darkened room (0.1 lux). Subjective photopic refraction and visual acuity were measured before light was turned off and mesopic refraction was obtained after a dark adaptation period of five minutes. Finally, frames and lenses were fitted by a centration system. Lens grinding was executed centralized by a grinding workshop. In the course of this study, subjects were randomly assigned to wear two glasses double-masked in turn. One with photopic subjective refraction data and another with mesopic subjective refraction data. Both were worn for 14 ± 2 days each.
Follow Up 1:
After two weeks, participants were asked for their subjective experiences with the first correction by a visual analogue scale questionnaire. After the evaluation, glasses were changed.
Follow Up 2:
Two weeks later, subjective experiences were evaluated again. After visual analogue scale questionnaire, subjects were asked to compare the two glasses concerning quality of mesopic vision and subjective safety level during night driving.
Follow Up 1:
After two weeks, participants were asked for their subjective experiences with the first correction by a visual analogue scale questionnaire. After the evaluation, glasses were changed.
Follow Up 2:
Two weeks later, subjective experiences were evaluated again. After visual analogue scale questionnaire, subjects were asked to compare the two glasses concerning quality of mesopic vision and subjective safety level during night driving.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: