Viewing Study NCT00492934


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 2:29 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-31 @ 10:54 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT00492934
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2014-09-10
First Post: 2007-06-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: What is the Best Preparation for Embryo Transfer in Cryo Cycles: a Natural Cycle or Light Hormonal Stimulation?
Sponsor: University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Natural Cycle Versus Stimulation With Human Menopausal Gonadotropin in Cycles With Cryopreserved Embryos
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2014-09
Last Known Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The study investigates if, among women with a regular cycle (between 25 and 45 days), the endometrium is better prepared for the transfer of an embryo that was cryopreserved and if the subsequent embryo implantation rate is higher when the cycle is started with daily, small-dose hormonal injections than in cycles without these daily injections.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: