Viewing Study NCT05326334


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 2:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 1:08 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05326334
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-04-18
First Post: 2022-03-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: THERApeutic Outcomes Related to Gut microBIOME in Glioblastoma (GBM) Patients Receiving Chemo-radiation (THERABIOME-GBM)
Sponsor: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: THERApeutic Outcomes Related to Gut microBIOME in Glioblastoma (GBM) Patients Receiving Chemo-radiation: A Prospective Observational Study
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: THERABIOME-GBM
Brief Summary: This is a pilot or feasibility study to test the study plan and to find out whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. Eligible participants (adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme \[GBM\] and had a good tumour resection \[\>= 70% of initial tumour volume\] and plan to receive 6 weeks of chemoradiation followed by up to 6 months of chemotherapy) are asked to donate their own stool samples at 4 different time points during their treatment course. Participants will also complete a 7-day diet diary and two questionnaires about their health-related quality of life.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of primary brain cancer in adults. The current best evidence-proven treatment for GBM includes maximum safe tumour resection, brain radiation over a 6-week period given with chemotherapy pills called temozolomide (Brand name: Temodal or Temodar), followed by approximately 6 months / cycles of temozolomide. Despite these treatments, the average life expectancy is generally less than 2 years.

Researchers are recognizing that the immune system has an important role in directing the effectiveness of chemotherapy, radiation, and newer therapies such as immunotherapies. Some immunotherapies have been quite successful in improving cancer control and survival in other cancers like melanoma (an aggressive skin cancer), but when these drugs were given to patients with GBM, there appeared to only be a small effect. Therefore, finding ways to make existing and new treatments work better should be a priority. Recent scientific studies have shown that the bacteria that make up our stool, often referred to as the gut microbiome, play a major role in regulating the immune system. For example, researchers were able to make patients with melanoma who previously did not respond to immunotherapy become responsive to the treatment after receiving a stool transplant from responders to immunotherapy. This provides proof of concept that we could modify the body's immune environment to favour cancer killing by changing a person's gut bacteria environment.

The role of the gut bacteria in patients with brain cancer is poorly understood as very few studies have been published about it in this population. We believe that understanding the composition of the gut microbiome and how it relates to the effectiveness and side effects of treatments in GBM patients will be an important first step to understanding how we can modify the gut microbiome to improve outcomes for patients living with GBM.
Detailed Description: This is a prospective observational study designed to assess changes in the gut microbial composition and diversity in prospectively collected stool samples at important time points throughout GBM treatment and surveillance and to correlate that with patient survival outcomes and radiation necrosis.

Objectives:

1. To assess feasibility of stool sample collection, banking, and analysis throughout the treatment course of GBM patients.
2. To determine the association of gut microbiome composition with survival outcomes in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) type 1 wild type glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
3. To assess the association of gut microbiome composition with radiation necrosis

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that stool collection and microbiome analysis taken from the time of diagnosis to disease recurrence will be feasible in Ottawa. Secondly, we hypothesize that in patients with newly diagnosed World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 4, IDH-1 R132H (Arginine to histidine mutation at site 132) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) receiving chemoradiation (Stupp regimen), increased microbial diversity and abundance of microbiota found to be favorable in other cancers will have better survival outcomes compared to decreased gut microbial diversity and relative abundance of microbiota found to be unfavorable in other cancers

Study sample size: n=20.

This study aims to enroll a prognostically uniform population presenting with newly diagnosed GBM at a single cancer center. The primary aim of the study is to establish feasibility of conducting such a study in Ottawa.

Primary Outcome(s) The primary outcome is study feasibility. Feasibility will be determined by the following co-primary endpoints.

1. Stool sample obtained at pre-radiation, post-radiation (pre-adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy), and at time of disease relapse in ≥ 70% of enrolled patients
2. Complete 15-patient (75% of target sample size) enrollment within 2 years
3. Stool sample volume and quality sufficient for analysis in ≥ 75% of collected samples

Secondary Outcomes

1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in pre-defined subgroups with high gut microbial diversity and relative abundance of taxa associated with favorable outcomes in other cancers vs. low diversity and unfavorable taxa subgroup.
2. Gut microbial taxonomy and diversity (i.e., microbiome make up) in late progressors versus early progressors
3. Differences in gut microbiome in patients with and without post-radiation necrosis.

Timing of Standard of Care Visits and Study Procedures

Participants will be followed as part of standard of care, which involves visits at the following time points:

* Baseline: post-surgery but before temozolomide (chemo) plus radiation (pre-chemoRT)
* 3-month: approximately one month after 6 weeks of chemoradiation (post-chemoRT), but before starting maintenance phase of chemotherapy
* Months 4 to 9: monthly while on maintenance phase of chemotherapy
* Every 2-3 months after completing maintenance chemo, usually corresponding to MRI scans

There are 4-5 time points during which study participants will be asked to participate in study procedures

1. Stool sample collection - 4 time points from the time of enrollment

* Baseline - pre-chemoRT
* 3 month - post-chemoRT
* 1 to 3 months after completing maintenance chemotherapy. As a result, this time point may vary (e.g., could be at 9-month mark if they finished 6 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy on schedule, but may be earlier or later, if patients stop maintenance chemo early or treatments repeatedly get delayed).
* Disease recurrence (12-week window of confirmed recurrence date)
2. 7-day diet diary - 4 time points from time of enrollment.

* Baseline: pre-chemoRT
* 3-month: post-chemoRT
* 9-month: usually corresponds to after maintenance chemo
* 12 month: even further out from completion of chemo
3. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BN20 questionnaires - 5 time points from time of enrollment

* Baseline: pre-chemoRT
* 3-month: post-chemoRT
* 6-month: usually mid-maintenance chemo
* 9-month: usually corresponds to after maintenance chemo
* 12-month: even further out from completion of chemo

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: