Viewing Study NCT03182933


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 2:42 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-07 @ 7:58 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT03182933
Status: TERMINATED
Last Update Posted: 2019-06-25
First Post: 2017-06-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Standard Bupivacaine in the Adductor Canal for Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Impact of Liposomal Bupivacaine Injected for Adductor Canal Block on Recovery Profile and Block Characteristics Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Status: TERMINATED
Status Verified Date: 2019-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Terminated due to surgeon preferences
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Study will evaluate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine on physical therapy measures and pain scores as well as opiate consumption.
Detailed Description: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with a large amount of postoperative pain. This pain can oftentimes be severe enough to limit participation in physical therapy and ultimately delay discharge resulting in increased cost. Several strategies have been developed in an effort to decrease postoperative pain following TKA while maintaining lower extremity strength and maximizing participation in physical therapy. Recently, adductor canal blockade has gained popularity as it is reported to provide analgesia to the anterior knee without resulting in significant quadriceps muscle weakness. One downside of single shot peripheral blockade is the duration of analgesia can oftentimes be short lived. The advent of depot local anesthetics has made this an attractive option, especially in busy practices where placing peri-neural catheters may not be practical or cost effective. This study aims to carefully evaluate this relationship using a physical therapy evaluation method that relies on both motor strength and pain control. In addition, we hope to carefully evaluate motor strength using a novel method of strength measurement in an effort to further evaluate the impact of depot local anesthetic injection into the adductor canal on physical therapy and analgesia.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: