Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-27 @ 9:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03037333
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-10-24
First Post:
2017-01-18
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram
Sponsor:
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prospective Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
EMERG-TV-PAC
Brief Summary:
A lot of questions about use of temporary transvenous pacing still remain obscure and there is no effective comparison between use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram in patients with bradicardias. The aim of the study is to evaluate how long does it take to start the correct cardiac stimulation with transvenous pacing in patients with bradicardias comparing use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram and compare rates of complications between two methods.
Detailed Description:
Approximately 150 subjects will be recruited over a planned recruitment period of 18 months. Patients will be submitted to ecchocardiogram using Philips Envisor, and electrocardiogram with Philips Healthcare PageWriter TC30.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: