Viewing Study NCT02549105


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:23 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-12 @ 1:27 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02549105
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2015-09-15
First Post: 2015-01-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Topical Application Versus Wound Infiltration With Lidocaine After Cesarean Section
Sponsor: Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Comparison Between Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Application And Wound Infiltration With Lidocaine For Post Caesarean Section Pain Relief : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2015-09
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: A Comparison Between Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Application And wound Infiltration with Lidocaine For Post Caesarean Section Pain Relief : A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Detailed Description: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of topically applied lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream with local anesthetic (lidocaine) infiltration on post-cesarean section pain.

Research Question:

Is lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream application effective as compared to local anesthetic (lidocaine) infiltration on post-caesarean section pain?

Research Hypothesis:

Lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream application is effective in post\_caesarean section pain as compared to local anesthetic (lidocaine) infiltration.

Clinical Application :

Topical Lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream could be applied frequent times postoperatively, unlike infiltration with local anesthetic.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: