Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:00 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04186702
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-12-05
First Post:
2019-11-30
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
New Concepts in Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Sponsor:
Ain Shams University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
New Concepts in Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Ranibizumab and Focal/Direct Laser for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
DME
Brief Summary:
Intravitreal ranibizumab injection procedure is simple and effective. In management of chronic DME there is no clear anatomical endpoint. Visual stability is the primary aim. Argon focal laser therapy can be the safe second choice. The combined therapy is successful and practical for chronic DME patients.
Detailed Description:
Settings and Design: Randomized clinical study
Subjects and Methods:
investigators randomly assigned 150 adults (the average age was 59.32 years ±2.79) with chronic diabetic macular edema involving the macular center for repeated ranibizumab injections (group A-75) or focal/direct argon laser after repeated ranibizumab injections (group B-75). The outcomes were the changes in visual acuity letter score and the central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to one year. visual-acuity Letter score, and CST were analyzed with independent t-test and Mann Whitney-test. General linear model with multivariate analysis was used for visual acuity letter score, and CST in both groups.
Subjects and Methods:
investigators randomly assigned 150 adults (the average age was 59.32 years ±2.79) with chronic diabetic macular edema involving the macular center for repeated ranibizumab injections (group A-75) or focal/direct argon laser after repeated ranibizumab injections (group B-75). The outcomes were the changes in visual acuity letter score and the central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to one year. visual-acuity Letter score, and CST were analyzed with independent t-test and Mann Whitney-test. General linear model with multivariate analysis was used for visual acuity letter score, and CST in both groups.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: