Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:06 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:02 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00592020
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2011-05-23
First Post:
2007-12-31
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Short Transverse Versus Conventional Hockey Stick Incision in Kidney Transplantation
Sponsor:
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
"Short Transverse" Versus Conventional "Hockey Stick" Incision in Kidney Transplantation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2011-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection).
Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.
The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.
Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.
The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: