Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:06 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:02 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00558220
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2007-11-14
First Post:
2007-02-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
R-MegaCHOP-ESHAP-BEAM in Patients With High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas
Sponsor:
Czech Lymphoma Study Group
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Phase II Study of Intensive Induction (R-MegaCHOP/ESHAP)Followed By Intensive Consolidation (BEAM) In Treatment Of High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2007-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
R-MCEB
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to show if addition of Rituximab to intensive induction (MegaCHOP/ESHAP) and high-dose consolidation (BEAM) improves progression-free and overall survival in patients younger than 65 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and aaIPI 2 or 3.
Detailed Description:
Previous study of Czech Lymphoma Study Group (4\_2002)have shown that intensive induction (MegaCHOP - Cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2, Vincristine 2 mg, Adriamycin 75 mg/m2, Prednisone 300 mg/m2 every three weeks with G-CSF for three cycles, followed by ESHAP - Etoposide 240 mg/m2, Cisplatin 100 mg/m2, Solumedrol 2000 mg and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 for three cycles every three weeks with G-CSF) followed by intensive consolidation (BEAM) and stem cell support improves progression-free survival in adult patients (18-65 years old) with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (namely, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma grade II) with aaIPI 2 and namely, with aaIPI 3. This study was aimed to find out if addition of four to six doses of Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on first day of every cycle of intensive induction further improves prognosis of these patients.
Inclusion criteria for this trial were:
* newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma, namely diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma grade III
* age 18-65 years
* age adjusted IPI (International Prognostic Index) score 2 or 3
* ECOG performance status 0-3
* signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria were:
* relapsed lymphoma
* previous treatment (up to one cycle of standard pretreatment - COP, CHOP or steroids was permitted and later became mandatory to decrease disease burden and/or improve the performance status of the patient)
* Burkitt lymphoma
* posttransplant lymphoproliferation
* CNS involvement
* other malignant tumor in previous history, except basalioma, skin squamocellular carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ
* other serious comorbidity
Primary endpoints was progression-free survival
Secondary endpoints were:
* rate of complete remission and overall response rate
* overall survival
* toxicity of the protocol, measured as grade III-IV toxicity and/or inability to finish the protocol as planned
Planned number of accrued patients was 100.
Inclusion criteria for this trial were:
* newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma, namely diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma grade III
* age 18-65 years
* age adjusted IPI (International Prognostic Index) score 2 or 3
* ECOG performance status 0-3
* signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria were:
* relapsed lymphoma
* previous treatment (up to one cycle of standard pretreatment - COP, CHOP or steroids was permitted and later became mandatory to decrease disease burden and/or improve the performance status of the patient)
* Burkitt lymphoma
* posttransplant lymphoproliferation
* CNS involvement
* other malignant tumor in previous history, except basalioma, skin squamocellular carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ
* other serious comorbidity
Primary endpoints was progression-free survival
Secondary endpoints were:
* rate of complete remission and overall response rate
* overall survival
* toxicity of the protocol, measured as grade III-IV toxicity and/or inability to finish the protocol as planned
Planned number of accrued patients was 100.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR-8231/3 | None | None | View |