Viewing Study NCT00121121



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 11:45 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:12 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00121121
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2007-03-15
First Post: 2005-07-13

Brief Title: Safety of Intradermal Versus Intramuscular Administration of HIV Lipopeptides in HIV Uninfected Adult Volunteers
Sponsor: French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Organization: French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis

Study Overview

Official Title: A Phase Ib Vaccine Trial Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of HIV Lipopeptides by Two Administration Routes Intramuscular And Intradermal in Healthy Adult Volunteers ANRS VAC16 Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2005-11
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Intramuscular IM administration of HIV lipopeptide vaccines have been shown to be able to induce HIV-1-specific T cell-mediated immune responses The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of LIPO-4 vaccine HIV lipopeptides including 4 peptides from Gag Pol RT and Nef HIV-1 proteins each peptide linked to TT intradermally ID compared to IM administration
Detailed Description: Dose-sparing strategies that use intradermal ID delivery of vaccines may be one approach for improving a vaccines immunogenicity and reducing the cost of vaccines

In this study 68 HIV-negative healthy adult volunteers 21-55 years old all belonging to the Volunteers for a Vaccine network set up by ANRS were randomized to receive at weeks 0 4 and 12 either 3 IM doses of 05 ml of LIPO-4 containing 500 µg of each peptide n 35 volunteers or 3 ID doses of 01 ml containing 100 µg of each peptide n33 volunteers Total follow-up was 48 weeks Safety was assessed clinically and by laboratory tests Participants were given diary cards to record adverse events HIV-1 immune responses were assessed by ELISPOT and lymphoproliferative assay at weeks 0 2 6 14 24 and 48

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None