Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:12 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-16 @ 8:15 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02157220
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2014-06-05
First Post:
2014-05-30
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Prospective Double-blinded Randomised Comparison of Profix Mobile to Fixed Bearing Knee Replacements
Sponsor:
The University of New South Wales
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
None
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2014-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a randomised control trial comparing two different prosthetic designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomised to receive either of the two prostheses and then were followed up of a period of 7 years, looking at pain, range of motion and impact on quality of life. The literature and joint registry of Australia shows that one of the prosthesis may be inferior to the other. Our research team hypothesised that this was not the case and that previous elicited differences were related to other factors.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: