Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:17 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-16 @ 2:09 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03879720
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2019-11-08
First Post:
2019-03-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Standard and Endoscope Assisted Endotracheal Intubation
Sponsor:
Stanford University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Standard Endotracheal Intubation [SEI] and Endoscope Assisted Endotracheal Intubation [EAE]
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2019-11
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparison of standard endotracheal intubation and endoscopist-facilitated endotracheal intubation
Detailed Description:
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures are typically performed using general anesthesia. During anesthesia, the anesthesiologist inserts a breathing tube (endotracheal tube) into the patient's wind pipe (trachea) and a machine helps the patient breathe (mechanical ventilation) while they are unconscious. The breathing tube is inserted with a patient laying on his/her back using a rigid metallic device (laryngoscope) to guide tube placement. The unconscious patient is then moved from the portable bed onto the X-ray table by nursing staff. The patient also has to be turned to lie on their stomach on the X-ray table for the procedure. This standard approach carries a small risk of patient injury during breathing tube placement as well as while moving and turning the unconscious patient onto the X-ray table.
At our endoscopy unit, endoscopists have, on several occasions, used a slim gastroscope to place the breathing tube under direct visualization in patients who are already positioned on their stomach for ERCP. This approach is rapid and has been uniformly successful and safe.
We hypothesize that this endoscopist-facilitated intubation approach may expedite the procedure and minimize ergonomic strain for staff during patient repositioning while minimizing patient injury during breathing tube placement and repositioning. This study seeks to formally compares the two approaches for placement of a breathing tube.
At our endoscopy unit, endoscopists have, on several occasions, used a slim gastroscope to place the breathing tube under direct visualization in patients who are already positioned on their stomach for ERCP. This approach is rapid and has been uniformly successful and safe.
We hypothesize that this endoscopist-facilitated intubation approach may expedite the procedure and minimize ergonomic strain for staff during patient repositioning while minimizing patient injury during breathing tube placement and repositioning. This study seeks to formally compares the two approaches for placement of a breathing tube.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: