Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:19 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:20 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03362320
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-07-14
First Post:
2017-11-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: Single Versus Double Layer Fixation
Sponsor:
Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Double- Versus Single-layer Reconstruction of the Rotator Cuff: Clinical and Radiological Outcome
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-07
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs remain unsatisfactorily high. Recently, attention has been paid to restore the rotator cuff's native anatomy by reconstructing the superior joint capsule. However, the debate whether to reconstruct only the superficial tendinous part or also the deeper capsulo-ligamentous part of the rotator cuff is ongoing. Thus, the intention of the present study is to compare double-layer versus single-layer arthroscopic rotator cuff repair regarding retear rate and clinical outcome.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: