Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:45 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-20 @ 9:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06664918
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-03-18
First Post:
2024-10-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effectiveness and Safety of Milk Ladders in Children with IgE-Mediated Cow's Milk Protein Allergy
Sponsor:
Medical University of Warsaw
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness and Safety of the 4-Step Versus 6-Step Milk Ladder in Children with IgE-Mediated Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: Protocol for an Open-Label Randomised Controlled Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is one of the most common food allergies in early childhood. The first-line treatment of CMPA is the elimination of cow's milk proteins (CMPs) from the child's or maternal diet.
Available data from the literature indicate that most children with CMPA acquire tolerance to CMPs with age. An assessment of tolerance acquisition to CMPs is commonly performed using milk ladder. However, scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the milk ladder in children with CMPA is limited. Currently, there is no standardised milk ladder protocol, and different versions of the ladder and recommend by scientific societies in various countries.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the 4-step milk ladder (4-ML) compared to the 6-step milk ladder (6-ML) in children with IgE-mediated CMPA. This is an open-label, randomised superiority trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Available data from the literature indicate that most children with CMPA acquire tolerance to CMPs with age. An assessment of tolerance acquisition to CMPs is commonly performed using milk ladder. However, scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the milk ladder in children with CMPA is limited. Currently, there is no standardised milk ladder protocol, and different versions of the ladder and recommend by scientific societies in various countries.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the 4-step milk ladder (4-ML) compared to the 6-step milk ladder (6-ML) in children with IgE-mediated CMPA. This is an open-label, randomised superiority trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Detailed Description:
Introducing baked milk into the diet of children with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) has been shown to potentially accelerate the development of tolerance to raw milk. However, there is no standardised milk ladder protocol, and different scientific societies across countries recommend varying versions.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the 4-step milk ladder (4-ML) compared to the 6-step milk ladder (6-ML) in children with IgE-mediated CMPA.
We will perform an open-label randomised trial with two parallel arms in two departments of the same academic hospital. A total of 92 children with IgE-mediated CMPA will be allocated to introduce cow's milk into their diet according to either 4-ML or 6-ML with a 4-week break period between subsequent steps. Oral food challenge (OFCs) with tested products at each subsequent step of the milk ladder will be conducted in hospital settings. The primary outcome will be the percentage of children with tolerance to non-heated cow's milk proteins defined as no allergic reaction to non-heated cow's milk (120-240 ml depending on the age of the patient) during the last OFC; measured at the end of the 12-week observation period for the 4-ML and 20-week observation period for the 6-ML. Secondary outcomes will include the percentage of children with a negative OFC to each milk ladder step; the percentage of children with anaphylaxis (both those who were treated and who were not treated with adrenaline); the percentage of children with exacerbation of atopic dermatitis; growth; compliance; and quality of life of the caregivers and parents' anxiety about adverse events during their child's OFC.
The statistical analyses will be conducted with StatsDirect. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the means of continuous variables if non-normal distribution will be assessed. Proportions will be compared with the Fisher exact test. The difference in study groups was considered significant when the P value will be \<05. The results of this study will be analyzed on the basis of intention to treat.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the 4-step milk ladder (4-ML) compared to the 6-step milk ladder (6-ML) in children with IgE-mediated CMPA.
We will perform an open-label randomised trial with two parallel arms in two departments of the same academic hospital. A total of 92 children with IgE-mediated CMPA will be allocated to introduce cow's milk into their diet according to either 4-ML or 6-ML with a 4-week break period between subsequent steps. Oral food challenge (OFCs) with tested products at each subsequent step of the milk ladder will be conducted in hospital settings. The primary outcome will be the percentage of children with tolerance to non-heated cow's milk proteins defined as no allergic reaction to non-heated cow's milk (120-240 ml depending on the age of the patient) during the last OFC; measured at the end of the 12-week observation period for the 4-ML and 20-week observation period for the 6-ML. Secondary outcomes will include the percentage of children with a negative OFC to each milk ladder step; the percentage of children with anaphylaxis (both those who were treated and who were not treated with adrenaline); the percentage of children with exacerbation of atopic dermatitis; growth; compliance; and quality of life of the caregivers and parents' anxiety about adverse events during their child's OFC.
The statistical analyses will be conducted with StatsDirect. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the means of continuous variables if non-normal distribution will be assessed. Proportions will be compared with the Fisher exact test. The difference in study groups was considered significant when the P value will be \<05. The results of this study will be analyzed on the basis of intention to treat.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: