Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:47 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:13 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00134277
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2011-09-09
First Post:
2005-08-23
Brief Title:
Trial Comparing Different Medical Devices for Infragenual Dilatation
Sponsor:
University Hospital Ghent
Organization:
University Hospital Ghent
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prospective Randomised Comparing Trial Between an Infragenual Dilatation ID an ID With Stenting an ID With Cutting Balloon and Laser Therapy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2011-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study is a comparison of different medical devices for infragenual dilatation
Detailed Description:
Dilatation and recanalisation of the distal veins infragenual popliteal artery tibiofibular trunc posterior tibial artery anterior tibial artery by classical balloon dilatation or cutting balloon with or without stenting or by endovascular laser This intervention happens only once the duration of the intervention depends on the procedure and the original injuries30 - 120 minutes
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None