Viewing Study NCT03273218


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:54 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:54 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03273218
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-03-06
First Post: 2017-08-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effectiveness of the Tiger Catheter on Transradial Coronariography: Randomized Compared to JudKins cathETers
Sponsor: Marcelo Alberto OLIVA
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Effectiveness of the Tiger Catheter as a Simple Multipurpuse Catheter in Transradial Coronariography: Randomized Comparerd to Judkins Catheters
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2017-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: TICKET
Brief Summary: The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of Tiger (5Fr) vs Judkins (5Fr) catheters, in coronariography via the right transradial approach.

This was a prospective, randomized, study of paralled design. Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), eligible for coronary angiography, was randomized after successuful cannulation of right artery and informed consent to either Tiger or Judkins catheters.
Detailed Description: analyzed a total of 120 consective diagnostic coronary angioggraphy cases from the right radial approach. Of these 60 cases were performed with single catheter (Tiger) and 60 cases were performed with conventional catheters (Judkins). The patients of both group were overall well balanced for gender, age, risk factors, height, weight and body surface area. Diagnostic angiograms were successfully achieved in all cases via the radial approach.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: