Viewing Study NCT03049059


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:01 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-07 @ 12:10 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03049059
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2017-02-09
First Post: 2017-02-03
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: A Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% Hydroquinone Cream With or Without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma
Sponsor: Mae Fah Luang University Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% Hydroquinone Cream With or Without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2017-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: A Comparative study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% hydroquinone cream with or without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma
Detailed Description: Primary Objective:

* To compare clinical efficacy by Modified MASI score between Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and daily application of 4% hydroquinone with 4% hydroquinone alone Secondary objectives
* To compare the clinical endpoints of Mexameter Melanin Index, brownish spot and Ultraviolet spots by VISIATM complexion analysis, The Antera 3D® imaging technology for pigmentation, quality of life by Dermatology Life Quality Index and patient's satisfaction between Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and 4% hydroquinone with 4% hydroquinone alone

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: