Viewing Study NCT03283592


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-04 @ 5:18 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT03283592
Status: WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted: 2019-04-04
First Post: 2017-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Review and Assessment of Network Meta-analyses for Knowledge Uptake Study
Sponsor: Unity Health Toronto
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Review and Assessment of Network Meta-analyses for Knowledge Uptake (RANK) Study
Status: WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date: 2019-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: did not receive funding to conduct study
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: RANK
Brief Summary: This randomized controlled trial will assess the interpretability of the rank-heat plot for presenting the results of network meta-analysis in comparison to SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking) plots which are suggested to present one of the best ranking statistics.
Detailed Description: Clinicians are responsible for making decisions to improve health outcomes. When available, clinicians should use the results of a knowledge synthesis, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses, to inform decision-making. Pairwise meta-analyses are limited, however, by the availability of RCTs that directly compare interventions. This is troublesome for knowledge users who require results from comparisons of multiple interventions to inform decision-making. To address this concern, the use of network meta-analyses (NMAs) is increasing in healthcare the literature. NMAs are a useful tool because they can summarize results from numerous studies and interventions. It is unclear how NMA results should be presented to increase the likelihood of clinicians understanding and using the results to improve health outcomes. Thus, a randomized controlled trial of NMA plots will be conducted. Participants will be randomized to either the rank-heat plot (intervention) or SUCRA plots (control) that present the same NMA results of a study that explored the effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for falls prevention. Outcomes will be ascertained via an online survey. The RCT will take place in an online environment and will require each participant to partake in a single session. This study will help guide best practices for the presentation of reviews to improve the uptake and use of NMA.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: