Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:54 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:15 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00164996
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2012-02-17
First Post:
2005-09-10
Brief Title:
Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia
Sponsor:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Organization:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patients With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2005-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether an ultrathin endoscope will improve a patients tolerance during the procedure In addition this study will look at whether local pharyngeal anaesthesia is necessary during ultrathin endoscopy
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None