Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-26 @ 7:19 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00509392
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-07-12
First Post:
2007-07-27
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
ClosureFAST vs. Laser Ablation for the Treatment of GSV Disease: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Study.
Sponsor:
Medtronic Endovascular
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Radiofrequency Endovenous ClosureFAST vs. Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Reflux: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Study (RECOVERY)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RECOVERY
Brief Summary:
The objective of this post-market study is to compare the post-procedure recovery between two types of minimally invasive catheter treatments for venous disease in the Great Saphenous Vein.
Detailed Description:
Comparison of the post-procedure recovery of radiofrequency (RFA) treatment vs. laser treatment.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: