Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:58 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:17 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00196222
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-07-04
First Post:
2005-09-13
Brief Title:
European Multicenter Study Radiofrequency RF Versus Cryo in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia AVNRT
Sponsor:
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Organization:
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Study Overview
Official Title:
European Multicenter Study RF Versus Cryo in AVNRT A Randomized Study Comparing Cryo-Energy vs Radiofrequency-Energy Ablation Technique for AV Nodal Reentry Tachycardia AVNRT
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In this randomized study two energy sources for the ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia are compared The standard technique of radiofrequency energy delivery is compared with the new approach of cryo-energy application
Detailed Description:
The ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia with radiofrequency RF energy delivering catheters is a standard procedure and in experienced EP laboratories the safety and efficacy of this approach is very high
However the potential complication of higher degree AV conduction block requiring in some instances implantation of a pacemaker is a major drawback of this approach
We want to compare in this randomized study the safety and efficacy of standard RF ablation with the cryo-ablation technique This relatively new technique is thought to offer more safety concerning higher degree AV conduction block
However the potential complication of higher degree AV conduction block requiring in some instances implantation of a pacemaker is a major drawback of this approach
We want to compare in this randomized study the safety and efficacy of standard RF ablation with the cryo-ablation technique This relatively new technique is thought to offer more safety concerning higher degree AV conduction block
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None