Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 12:01 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:18 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00213681
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-06-18
First Post:
2005-09-14
Brief Title:
CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Sponsor:
University Hospital Rouen
Organization:
University Hospital Rouen
Study Overview
Official Title:
CPAP Boussignac Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Severe Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure more rapidly improves ventilation than continuous positive airway pressure CPAP in patients with acute pulmonary edema CPAP is delivered via a simple device connected to oxygen
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None