Viewing Study NCT03381092


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:52 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-05 @ 3:58 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03381092
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2021-11-29
First Post: 2017-12-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically Node-negative Early Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Sponsor: Peking University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically Node-negative Early Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2021-11
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, non-controlled observational study.
Detailed Description: The panel of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017 strongly believed that sentinel lymph node biopsy to be appropriate and favored the biopsy be carried out after neoadjuvant treatment in patients who presented with a clinically negative axilla and who received neoadjuvant treatment.

Patients with clinically node-negative early breast cancer treated in Breast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center Peking University Cancer Hospital from February 2013 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate whether sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the positive rate of SLN and the rate of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The study group underwent SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the control group underwent SLN biopsy before chemotherapy. A total of 395 patients were eligible, including 85 in the study group and 310 in the control group. The detection rate of SLNs was 95.3% vs 98.7%(χ2 = 3.922,P = 0.069) in the study group compared with the control group, the positive rate of SLNs was 1.2% vs 18.6%(χ2 = 15.207,P = 0.000), and the rate of ALND was 5.9% vs 15.2%(χ2 = 5.024,P = 0.025) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the study group had lower SLN positive rate (OR = 0.052, 95% CI: 0.0070 to 0.38, P = 0.004) and ALND rate (OR = 0.310, 95% CI: 0.118 to 0.812, P = 0.017). There was no statistically significant difference in detection rate of SLNs (OR = 0.244, 95% CI: 0.058 to 1.021, P = 0.053)between the two groups.

The aim of this study is to explore the detection rate and positive rate of sentinel lymph nodes, the rate of axillary lymph node dissection, and the proportion of patients with axillary lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-negative early breast cancer. A mathematical model of axillary lymph node status will be established to predict axillary lymph node metastases.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: