Viewing Study NCT02590666


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:05 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-24 @ 9:55 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02590666
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2016-03-09
First Post: 2015-10-25
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers
Sponsor: University of Cagliari
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2016-03
Last Known Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Several hysteroscopic systems to resect endometrial polyps are currently available. Among Others bipolar systems and microscissors or graspers, both of theme make part of routine clinical practice and are universally accepted.

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .

Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: