Viewing Study NCT03122730



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 9:58 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 12:22 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT03122730
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-05-31
First Post: 2017-04-11

Brief Title: VentaProst Versus Conventionally-Administered Aerosolized Epoprostenol in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With CPB
Sponsor: Aerogen Pharma Limited
Organization: Aerogen Pharma Limited

Study Overview

Official Title: A Two-Part Pharmacodynamic Study to Compare VentaProst Epoprostenol Solution for Inhalation Via Custom Drug Delivery System Dosing to Conventionally Administered Aerosolized Epoprostenol Dosing in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of the Phase 2a study is to 1 demonstrate that the estimated VentaProst dose is safe and equivalent in effect to a dose administered via epoprostenol aerosolization by the current off-label-use practice and 2 demonstrate that an optimum effect can be rapidly obtained with VentaProst titration
Detailed Description: Part I

This part of the study is designed to demonstrate the dose equivalence between off-label aerosolized epoprostenol and VentaProst using a patients hemodynamic parameters

Part II

This part of the study is designed to establish a dose response relationship of VentaProst to hemodynamic effect by dose escalation in patients who have had cardiac surgery with CPB

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None