Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:15 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:13 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05836766
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-09-28
First Post:
2023-04-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Cilostazol Dexborneol Versus Placebo for Microcirculation Dysfunction After Reperfusion Therapy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion
Sponsor:
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cilostazol Dexborneol Versus Placebo for Microcirculation Dysfunction After Reperfusion Therapy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Phase Ⅱa,Prospective,Multicenter,Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-controlled Parallel Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-09
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CRYSTAL
Brief Summary:
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Y-6 sublingual tablets in improving microcirculation dysfunction and reducing thrombo-inflammation in patients who had AIS caused by LVO and received reperfusion therapy. Moreover, we expect to evaluate the safety of using Y-6 sublingual tablet in such study population.
Detailed Description:
This study rationale is based on the following scheme: in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by LVO, receiving reperfusion therapy may cause futile recanalization and thus lead to microcirculation dysfunction and thrombo-inflammation as consequences. Cilostazol has antiplatelet effects and BBB protection and Dexborneol has anti-inflammatory effects; therefore, the multi-component tablet may exert neuroprotective effects in terms of improving microcirculation dysfunction and reducing thrombo-inflammation in patients with AIS after reperfusion therapy.
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the proportion of modified-Rankin scale (mRS) score recovered to 0\~1 score at 90±7 days after randomization.
The follow-up duration is 3 months, and the visit schedule is as follows: Subjects enrolled based on randomization procedures will receive visits at screening/baseline period, first drug administration, immediately after reperfusion therapy(within 2 hours), 24 ± 2 hours, 96 ± 7 hours, 14 ± 2 days, 28 ± 2 days and 90 ± 7 days after randomization, and in case of any events.
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the proportion of modified-Rankin scale (mRS) score recovered to 0\~1 score at 90±7 days after randomization.
The follow-up duration is 3 months, and the visit schedule is as follows: Subjects enrolled based on randomization procedures will receive visits at screening/baseline period, first drug administration, immediately after reperfusion therapy(within 2 hours), 24 ± 2 hours, 96 ± 7 hours, 14 ± 2 days, 28 ± 2 days and 90 ± 7 days after randomization, and in case of any events.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: