Viewing Study NCT03659266


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-01 @ 2:06 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT03659266
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-14
First Post: 2018-09-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effects of Combined Treatment by Botulinum Toxin and Lokomat® on Walking Ability in Chronic Stroke
Sponsor: Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Effects of Combined Treatment by Botulinum Toxin A and Robot-Assisted Gait Training (Lokomat®) on Walking Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke: a Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: Lokomat
Brief Summary: 75% patients in the chronic phase of a stroke keep walking disabilities. Focal spasticity in the paretic lower limb frequently causes these walking disabilities, and the gold standard treatment is intramuscular injection of Botulinum toxin A in the spastic muscles.

To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.

In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.

Tested hypothesis: Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.

Outcome:

-Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)

Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.

Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.

Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).

Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.

The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.
Detailed Description: Introduction :

75% patients in the chronic phase of a stroke (\>6 months) keep walking disabilities. Focal spasticity in the paretic lower limb frequently causes these walking disabilities, and the gold standard treatment is intramuscular injection of Botulinum toxin A in the spastic muscles.

To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.

In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.

Materials and Methods:

Tested hypothesis:

Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.

Aims:

* Primary: to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.
* Secondary: to determine the optimal time between the toxin injection and the start of robotic rehabilitation; to evaluate the effects of the combined treatment on the balance and spasticity.

Outcome:

* Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)
* Secondary: walking speed (meters/seconds), balance (Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale), spasticity (score on the Modified Ashworth Scale and joint range of motion)

Study Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.

Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.

Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).

1. st Group D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae, according to pre-established modalities (no influence of the experimental protocol on this stage) W2-W4: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
2. nd Group: D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae W2-W4: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)

Expected results:

Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.

The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: