Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:31 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:01 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06049966
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-09-22
First Post:
2023-09-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Atezolizumab in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Sponsor:
Oncology Center of Biochemical Education And Research
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Atezolizumab in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung and the Value of miR21 and miR-375 as Biomarkers
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LANCE
Brief Summary:
Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive form of cancer that presents significant challenges regarding treatment options and prognosis. In this trial, the effectiveness of Atezolizumab in treating metastatic LCNEC was evaluated. Atezolizumab is an anti-PD-L1 antibody that has shown promising results in other types of cancer, such as small-cell lung Cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. The trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a potential treatment option for treatment-naive patients with metastatic LCNEC The trial was conducted as an open-label, non-randomized study, comparing Atezolizumab plus platinum etoposide to platinum etoposide alone in patients with metastatic LCNEC.
Detailed Description:
This trial is a prospective clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination treatment regimen for patients with metastatic Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) originating from the lung. The trial occurred between March 2018 and August 2022 at the 3rd Department of Medicine, Kapodistrian Medical School of Athens. The institutional review board of Sotiria Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens approved it. The trial adhered to Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients or their legal representatives provided informed consent.
Patients:
The trial enrolled patients with metastatic LCNEC originating from the lung. Eligible patients had not received prior systemic treatment for LCNEC. Patients with brain metastases at diagnosis underwent Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) before starting systemic treatment.
Study Design:
The experimental group received a combination treatment regimen consisting of four cycles of Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab every 21 days.
Patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a response (partial or complete) continued maintenance treatment with Atezolizumab until disease progression or discontinuation due to severe adverse events.
The control group received four cycles of Carboplatin and Etoposide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were not allowed in later lines of treatment for the control group.
Response to therapy was assessed using CT scans and physical evaluations.
Endpoints:
Progression Free Survival (PFS): The time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death.
Overall Survival (OS): The time from treatment initiation to death. Overall Response Rate (ORR): The percentage of patients with a complete or partial response based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Duration of Response (DoR): The length of time the disease responded to treatment without progression on imaging studies.
Procedure:
Patients were treated at the 3rd Department of Medicine, Kapodistrian Medical School of Athens.
Approval for immunotherapy was obtained from the National Organisation for the Provision of Health Services (EOPYY) for each patient.
Blood samples for miR-375 and miR-21 analysis were collected at specific time points and processed according to standard procedures.
Analysis of miRNA expression was performed using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit.
Statistical Analysis:
Rstudio was used for statistical analysis. The trial did not include a power analysis. The intention-to-treat principle was followed. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox Regression survival analysis were used to estimate PFS and OS.
An analysis of the significance of the difference in characteristics between the experimental and control groups was conducted.
miR-21 and miR-375 Analysis:
Control samples for miR-21 and miR-375 were collected from volunteers without a cancer diagnosis, matching age with LCNEC patients.
Blood samples were collected at specific time points and processed to isolate plasma.
RNA was isolated from plasma samples, followed by cDNA synthesis and miRNA quantification using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit.
MiR-103a-3p was used as a reference gene. Real-time PCR was performed to quantify miRNAs, and the results were expressed relative to the control group.
Patients:
The trial enrolled patients with metastatic LCNEC originating from the lung. Eligible patients had not received prior systemic treatment for LCNEC. Patients with brain metastases at diagnosis underwent Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) before starting systemic treatment.
Study Design:
The experimental group received a combination treatment regimen consisting of four cycles of Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab every 21 days.
Patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a response (partial or complete) continued maintenance treatment with Atezolizumab until disease progression or discontinuation due to severe adverse events.
The control group received four cycles of Carboplatin and Etoposide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were not allowed in later lines of treatment for the control group.
Response to therapy was assessed using CT scans and physical evaluations.
Endpoints:
Progression Free Survival (PFS): The time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death.
Overall Survival (OS): The time from treatment initiation to death. Overall Response Rate (ORR): The percentage of patients with a complete or partial response based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Duration of Response (DoR): The length of time the disease responded to treatment without progression on imaging studies.
Procedure:
Patients were treated at the 3rd Department of Medicine, Kapodistrian Medical School of Athens.
Approval for immunotherapy was obtained from the National Organisation for the Provision of Health Services (EOPYY) for each patient.
Blood samples for miR-375 and miR-21 analysis were collected at specific time points and processed according to standard procedures.
Analysis of miRNA expression was performed using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit.
Statistical Analysis:
Rstudio was used for statistical analysis. The trial did not include a power analysis. The intention-to-treat principle was followed. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox Regression survival analysis were used to estimate PFS and OS.
An analysis of the significance of the difference in characteristics between the experimental and control groups was conducted.
miR-21 and miR-375 Analysis:
Control samples for miR-21 and miR-375 were collected from volunteers without a cancer diagnosis, matching age with LCNEC patients.
Blood samples were collected at specific time points and processed to isolate plasma.
RNA was isolated from plasma samples, followed by cDNA synthesis and miRNA quantification using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit.
MiR-103a-3p was used as a reference gene. Real-time PCR was performed to quantify miRNAs, and the results were expressed relative to the control group.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: