Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 4:40 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:23 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00292513
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2006-02-16
First Post:
2006-02-15
Brief Title:
Clinical Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive Vs Absorbable Suture Vs Non-Absorbable Suture
Sponsor:
Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego
Organization:
Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive 2-Octylcyanoacrylate Vs Absorbable Suture Vs Non-Absorbable Suture for the Closure of Low Tension Facial and Neck Wounds in Children and Adolescents
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2005-05
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Standard suture is superior to both tissue adhesive 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and absorbable sutures with respect to cosmetic outcome of complication rate of and parental satisfaction with the closure of low tension facial neck and shoulder wounds in children and adolescents
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None