Viewing Study NCT02404766


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:32 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-05 @ 6:23 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT02404766
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2015-03-31
First Post: 2015-03-26
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effects of C0-C1 Mobilization in the Neutral Position in Subjects With Upper Cervical Rotational Hypomobility
Sponsor: Universidad de Zaragoza
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: None
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2015-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: C1-C2 is the most mobile segment of the spine and its dysfunction is frequently associated to cervical pain and headache. However, serious neurovascular adverse effects have been documented through direct treatment of C1-C2 segment. Although indirect treatment via adjacent segments and avoidance of end range of rotation and extension have been recommended for a safer and effective cervical treatment, there is no scientific evidence of the effectiveness of the indirect treatment approach in the cervical neutral position for C1-C2 hypomobility.

Due to that, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial to compare the short-term effects in the Flexion Rotation Test (FRT) of a translatoric mobilization of C0-C1, a translatoric mobilization of C7-T1 and a control group in subjects with C1-C2 hypomobility.The primary hypothesis is that C0-C1 dorsal glide mobilization applied in the neutral cervical position can recover the C1-C2 rotational range of movement in subjects with upper cervical hypomobility.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: