Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 11:07 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02226666
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-01-13
First Post:
2014-08-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Physiologic Assessment Following Gadoxetic Acid and Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration
Sponsor:
University of Michigan
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Physiologic Assessment Following Gadoxetic Acid and Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the physiologic response of patients who receive either intravenous gadoxetic acid (Eovist) or intravenous gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance).
Detailed Description:
Contrast-enhanced hepatic MRI is an accepted method for detecting and characterizing liver lesions. Liver lesion characterization is fundamental for patient management, because lesions that meet specific imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are assumed to be HCC without tissue confirmation. There are a variety of gadolinium-based contrast agents that are used for this purpose. Two of the more commonly utilized are gadoxetic acid (an hepatobiliary contrast agent that permits 20 minute hepatobiliary phase imaging) and gadobenate dimeglumine (a weak hepatobiliary contrast agent that functions generally as an extracellular contrast agent). A recent study by our group has shown that patients who receive intravenous gadoxetic acid are much more likely to experience transient dyspnea after contrast injection that causes them to breathe rapidly through the arterial phase of imaging, degrading image quality. In that study, subjective complaints of dyspnea and respiratory motion artifact on imaging were scored. The investigators did not assess patient physiologic response. The goal of the proposed work is to build on our prior data and to determine whether there are non-invasively measurable physiologic parameters that can support our original study. Specifically, the investigators want to determine whether there are predictable changes in SpO2, pulse, respiratory periodicity, and respiratory regularity that correlate with arterial phase image degradation and patients complains of dyspnea. Both contrast agents to be assessed in this study are FDA approved with at least 4 years of post-marketing experience documenting safety and efficacy. The investigators will not be changing or altering our clinical approach in any way as a part of this study.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: