Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:58 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 9:21 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04999150
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-08-17
First Post:
2021-08-09
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Corticotomy and Micro-Osteoperforation During Canine Retraction
Sponsor:
University of Puerto Rico
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial for the Comparison of Corticotomy and Micro-Osteoperforations During Canine Retraction: A Pilot Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation (MOP) have been proven to accelerate tooth movement and shorten orthodontic treatment time, compared to conventional treatment. MOP is less invasive; however, it is unclear whether it is as effective as a corticotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the maxillary canine retraction achieved by these techniques.
Detailed Description:
Thirteen patients (5 females, 8 males; mean age, 18.07±6.74 years) with healthy permanent dentition requiring the extraction of maxillary first premolars were included in a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Subjects with previous orthodontic or endodontic treatment of canines were excluded. At least 3 months post-extraction, MOPs, and corticotomies were performed distal to the canines. Mini-screws with closed-coil springs (150g) were used for canine retraction. Dental casts were attained at baseline (T0) and 3 months post-intervention (T1). Calibrated examiners measured the distances from the canine to the second premolar on both sides. A Signed-rank sum test was used to compare canine retraction achieved in 3 months (T0-T1) in two sides
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: