Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:06 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06266650
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-03
First Post:
2023-12-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Unilateral vs Bilateral Application of Muscle Energy Techniques in Pelvic Somatic Dysfunction
Sponsor:
The Touro College and University System
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Novel Applications of the Pubic Muscle Energy Technique for Pelvic Somatic Dysfunctions Against Their Standard Treatment Modalities.
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PMEOMT
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of pelvic muscle energy technique online against the traditional full length osteopathic pelvic treatment protocol. The main question it aims to answer are
• Can one single pelvic muscle energy technique can correct all pelvic somatic dysfunctions (SD)?
Participants will
* be positioned by the physician into the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier.
* be instructed to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce.
* be instructed to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier.
* These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. One group will be treated with traditional one and be compared with the pelvic muscle energy group.
• Can one single pelvic muscle energy technique can correct all pelvic somatic dysfunctions (SD)?
Participants will
* be positioned by the physician into the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier.
* be instructed to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce.
* be instructed to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier.
* These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. One group will be treated with traditional one and be compared with the pelvic muscle energy group.
Detailed Description:
Osteopathic muscle energy technique (MET) is a well-known modality widely used by osteopathic practitioners. MET can be applied to different regions and segments of the body, is well tolerated and effective in reducing muscle hypertonicity and pain sensation. MET involves a patient actively using their muscles on request from a precisely controlled position, in a specific direction, against a distinctly executed counter force. The group of pelvic MET consists of specific variations directed to particular somatic dysfunction (SD) of innominate and pubic bones, such as pelvic shears, pelvic outflares and pelvic inflares. All techniques are well known and widely used. Based on empirical clinical observations, not confirmed by any research, it was suggested that pubic abduction/adduction SD MET combination should be able to correct all pelvic SD including innominate SD.
The investigators intend to assess if application of abduction/adduction SD combination MET may resolve any one-sided diagnosed pelvic SD.
MET involves a patient actively using their muscles on request from a precisely controlled position, in a specific direction, against a distinctly executed counter force. During MET, the physician positions the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier. The physician then instructs the patient to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce. The physician then tells the patient to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier. These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. The control group will be treated with traditional one-sided MET, the second group will be treated with combination MET. Results of post-treatment exams will be collected and statistically analyzed.
The investigators intend to assess if application of abduction/adduction SD combination MET may resolve any one-sided diagnosed pelvic SD.
MET involves a patient actively using their muscles on request from a precisely controlled position, in a specific direction, against a distinctly executed counter force. During MET, the physician positions the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier. The physician then instructs the patient to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce. The physician then tells the patient to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier. These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. The control group will be treated with traditional one-sided MET, the second group will be treated with combination MET. Results of post-treatment exams will be collected and statistically analyzed.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: