Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:58 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05103150
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-03-31
First Post:
2021-10-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Virtual Chromoendoscopy With Magnification in Coeliac Disease.
Sponsor:
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Optical Enhancement Virtual Chromoendoscopy With High-definition Optical Magnification for Duodenal Mucosa Characterization in Coeliac Disease Patients.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-03
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
High-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) does not usually allow the visualization of duodenal villous patterns and may be inaccurate for assessing coeliac disease (CD). To the best of the knowledge of the authorship, there is no prospective study that has evaluated the accuracy of combining high-definition optical magnification (HD-OM) with i-Scan optical enhancement (OE) virtual chromoendoscopy for evaluation of duodenal villous patterns in the context of CD suspicion. Combining both techniques can also guide better duodenal biopsies. This study pursues to compare diagnostic accuracy between HD-WLE and HD-OM with OE using histology as the gold standard in detecting villous abnormalities in CD.
Detailed Description:
High-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) does not usually allow the visualization of duodenal villous patterns and may be inaccurate for assessing coeliac disease (CD). In addition, HD-WLE findings depend on CD severity. The lesser the disease severity, the higher possibility of showing a normal HD-WLE appearance. Thus, sampling routine duodenal biopsies have been suggested. However, this is time-consuming, expensive, and maybe excessive in low-risk groups. Sampling routine duodenal biopsies could also be unsuccessful, obtaining normal biopsies.
Novel endoscopic techniques have played an exciting role in increasing the accuracy of macroscopic evaluation of duodenal villous patterns. There have been described retrospective and prospective studies using chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, water immersion, confocal laser endomicroscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and I-scan technology. However, results are disjunct, with no consensus.
The iSCAN optical enhancementTM (OE) System (PENTAX Medical, Tokyo, Japan) virtual chromoendoscopy has been developed to improve the blood vessels' visibility, ducts of the glands, and surface structures in addition to the traditional iSCAN functions. High-definition optical magnification (HD-OM) endoscopes have been developed and can combine HD imaging with OM to produce detailed images with a magnification of up to 136X. This imaging technique facilitates the evaluation of the superficial vascular aspects of the mucosa, enabling the identification of early signs of inflammation or lesions not previously seen with conventional endoscopy.
Prospective data have demonstrated that magnification endoscopy has superior diagnostic sensitivity in detecting villous atrophy compared to HD-WLE, being efficiently handled by all endoscopists. On another side, virtual chromoendoscopy has shown disjunct results across the literature. To the best of the knowledge of the authorship, there is no prospective study that has assessed the accuracy of combining HD-OM with i-Scan OE for evaluation of duodenal villous patterns in the context of CD suspicion. Combining both techniques can also guide better duodenal biopsies.
This study pursues to better characterize duodenal mucosa through OE with HD-OM in gluten-free diet (GFD) naïve patients with CD suspicion to correlate these findings with histology. As a second aim, to compare diagnostic accuracy between HD-WLE and HD-OM with OE using histology as the gold standard in detecting villous abnormalities in CD.
Novel endoscopic techniques have played an exciting role in increasing the accuracy of macroscopic evaluation of duodenal villous patterns. There have been described retrospective and prospective studies using chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, water immersion, confocal laser endomicroscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and I-scan technology. However, results are disjunct, with no consensus.
The iSCAN optical enhancementTM (OE) System (PENTAX Medical, Tokyo, Japan) virtual chromoendoscopy has been developed to improve the blood vessels' visibility, ducts of the glands, and surface structures in addition to the traditional iSCAN functions. High-definition optical magnification (HD-OM) endoscopes have been developed and can combine HD imaging with OM to produce detailed images with a magnification of up to 136X. This imaging technique facilitates the evaluation of the superficial vascular aspects of the mucosa, enabling the identification of early signs of inflammation or lesions not previously seen with conventional endoscopy.
Prospective data have demonstrated that magnification endoscopy has superior diagnostic sensitivity in detecting villous atrophy compared to HD-WLE, being efficiently handled by all endoscopists. On another side, virtual chromoendoscopy has shown disjunct results across the literature. To the best of the knowledge of the authorship, there is no prospective study that has assessed the accuracy of combining HD-OM with i-Scan OE for evaluation of duodenal villous patterns in the context of CD suspicion. Combining both techniques can also guide better duodenal biopsies.
This study pursues to better characterize duodenal mucosa through OE with HD-OM in gluten-free diet (GFD) naïve patients with CD suspicion to correlate these findings with histology. As a second aim, to compare diagnostic accuracy between HD-WLE and HD-OM with OE using histology as the gold standard in detecting villous abnormalities in CD.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: