Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 11:45 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06176950
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-12-20
First Post:
2023-12-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
History of Neonatology
Sponsor:
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
History of Neonatology
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study traces the history of neonatology in the United States from the 1960s to the present with particular attention to the ways in which neonatologists developed criteria to make treatment decisions. I will be using oral history interviews as one source for a book that will document developments in the history of neonatology. I will identify potential research subjects through their publications in the field of neonatology and through word of mouth. I will locate them via the contact information provided in their publications or through an internet search.
Detailed Description:
I will interview individuals who have worked in NICUs \[neonatologists, nurses, social workers\] to understand how technological changes and changing scientific understanding influenced decision making pertaining to the treatment of infants. The interviews will supplement my extensive research of the medical literature and other pertinent publications.
Between the 1960s and the present, we have seen the emergence of medical therapies and technologies developed to treat neonates. Over this time period, there has also been a changing and growing understanding of the long-term impact that medical interventions have on the infants treated as well as on their families. Finally, the demographic characteristics of neonates have also changed as public health crises as well as the development of modern reproductive technologies led to new patient populations and new expectations of what NICUs should or should not achieve. I am interested in the ways in which these changes have led to evolving treatment criteria for neonates and ways in which neonatologists decided when to treat and when treatment was considered futile. I will interview medical professionals who are working or have worked at NICUs about the changes they experienced in their place of work over the course of their careers, the impact that medical technologies and changing patient populations had on considerations about treatment options, and the discussions they had with colleagues and the parents of patients.
There is to date no sustained historical analysis of neonatology. There are anthropological studies of the development of fetal surgery \[Casper 1998\] as well as Assisted Reproductive Technologies \[Spar, 2006; Thompson, 2005\]. There are analyses of the social history of particular medical interventions \[abortion, birth control, etc.\] \[Schoen, 1995; Schoen 2005\] and the treatment of the fetus \[Withycombe, 2019\]. And scholars have discussed the value of reproduction and the fetus as it pertains to emerging technologies of genetic testing and the history of disability \[Davis, 2019; Herzog, 2018; Lowy, 2018; Maienschein, 2003; Maienschein, 2014; Rapp, 2000; Reagan, 2010.\] This study will contribute to our understanding of the ways in which medical professionals have made decisions about life, death, and the quality of life of those being treated.
Between the 1960s and the present, we have seen the emergence of medical therapies and technologies developed to treat neonates. Over this time period, there has also been a changing and growing understanding of the long-term impact that medical interventions have on the infants treated as well as on their families. Finally, the demographic characteristics of neonates have also changed as public health crises as well as the development of modern reproductive technologies led to new patient populations and new expectations of what NICUs should or should not achieve. I am interested in the ways in which these changes have led to evolving treatment criteria for neonates and ways in which neonatologists decided when to treat and when treatment was considered futile. I will interview medical professionals who are working or have worked at NICUs about the changes they experienced in their place of work over the course of their careers, the impact that medical technologies and changing patient populations had on considerations about treatment options, and the discussions they had with colleagues and the parents of patients.
There is to date no sustained historical analysis of neonatology. There are anthropological studies of the development of fetal surgery \[Casper 1998\] as well as Assisted Reproductive Technologies \[Spar, 2006; Thompson, 2005\]. There are analyses of the social history of particular medical interventions \[abortion, birth control, etc.\] \[Schoen, 1995; Schoen 2005\] and the treatment of the fetus \[Withycombe, 2019\]. And scholars have discussed the value of reproduction and the fetus as it pertains to emerging technologies of genetic testing and the history of disability \[Davis, 2019; Herzog, 2018; Lowy, 2018; Maienschein, 2003; Maienschein, 2014; Rapp, 2000; Reagan, 2010.\] This study will contribute to our understanding of the ways in which medical professionals have made decisions about life, death, and the quality of life of those being treated.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: