Viewing Study NCT00395993



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 5:07 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:28 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00395993
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2018-02-20
First Post: 2006-11-02

Brief Title: Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
Sponsor: American Regent Inc
Organization: American Regent Inc

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron vs Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2018-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study compares of the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron vs oral iron in the treatment of anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding
Detailed Description: This is an open-label randomized Phase III active-control study of the efficacy and safety of IV iron vs oral iron in patients with anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None