Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 5:09 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:28 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00391937
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-03-01
First Post:
2006-10-24
Brief Title:
Efficacy of a New Resurfacing Hip Prosthesis
Sponsor:
Erasmus Medical Center
Organization:
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of a New Resurfacing Hip Prosthesis A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare the articular surface replacement ASR prosthesis placed by the conventional positioning method and the ASR prosthesis placed by computer assisted surgery CAS in variation between pre planned position of the femoral component and the actual position of the femoral component of the prosthesis The hypothesis is that this variation is larger with the conventional positioning method than when CAS is used
Detailed Description:
For patients who suffer from end stage of osteoarthritis of the hip a joint replacement could result in an obvious improvement of the quality of life However because of the life expectation and high level of activity of young and active patients the conventional total hip replacement does not offer an optimal solution
An alternative to a total hip replacement in young and active patients is the resurfacing hip prostheses The articular surface replacement ASR hip prostheses can be placed by the conventional positioning method and by using computer assisted surgery CAS The hypothesis is that the positioning of the femoral component by the conventional positioning method will show a larger variation between pre planned and actual position than when CAS is used
This study will compare the results of those who had an ASR prosthesis placed by the conventional positioning method with those patients in whom the ASR prosthesis was placed using CAS
An alternative to a total hip replacement in young and active patients is the resurfacing hip prostheses The articular surface replacement ASR hip prostheses can be placed by the conventional positioning method and by using computer assisted surgery CAS The hypothesis is that the positioning of the femoral component by the conventional positioning method will show a larger variation between pre planned and actual position than when CAS is used
This study will compare the results of those who had an ASR prosthesis placed by the conventional positioning method with those patients in whom the ASR prosthesis was placed using CAS
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None