Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:40 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 11:11 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05400668
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-11-22
First Post:
2022-05-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Turkish Version of the Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome Score
Sponsor:
Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS-Tr) Score
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) score was originally developed in Dutch to assess severity of disease relative to patient-reported outcome, particularly patients with MTSS. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MTSS score into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties.
Detailed Description:
The medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) score was originally developed in Dutch to assess severity of disease relative to patient-reported outcome, particularly people with MTSS. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MTSS score into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties. Fourty-eight individuals with MTSS will include. Within a 7-day period after the first assessment, the participants completed the Turkish version of the MTSS score to evaluate test-retest reliability.
Cronbach's alpha (α) was used to assess internal consistency. Construct validity was examined total score of PCS domain of SF-36-Tr with MTSS-Tr total score in the first visit. Concurrent validity was examined by evaluating the relationship between pain level and Detmer's classification with MTSS score in the first visit. The pain level of the patient assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) score.
Cronbach's alpha (α) was used to assess internal consistency. Construct validity was examined total score of PCS domain of SF-36-Tr with MTSS-Tr total score in the first visit. Concurrent validity was examined by evaluating the relationship between pain level and Detmer's classification with MTSS score in the first visit. The pain level of the patient assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) score.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: