Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 5:25 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:32 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00459030
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-08-19
First Post:
2007-04-09
Brief Title:
Traditional Print Communication Methods Simple Electronic Communication Methods or Usual Care in Increasing How Often Older Women Undergo Colorectal Cancer Screening
Sponsor:
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Organization:
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Study Overview
Official Title:
Two Delivery Channels to Improve CRC Screening
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
RATIONALE Finding out which communication method affects a participants decision to undergo colorectal cancer screening may help increase the number of participants who undergo screening It is not yet known which communication method is more effective in increasing how often participants undergo colorectal cancer screening
PURPOSE This randomized clinical trial is studying traditional print communication methods to see how well they work compared with simple electronic communication methods or usual care in increasing how often older women undergo colorectal cancer screening
PURPOSE This randomized clinical trial is studying traditional print communication methods to see how well they work compared with simple electronic communication methods or usual care in increasing how often older women undergo colorectal cancer screening
Detailed Description:
OBJECTIVES
Compare traditional print versus simple electronic communication versus usual care in terms of increasing colorectal cancer CRC screening rates in average-risk women attending a routine OBGyn visit
Explore the moderating role of attentional style and background variables on the impact of the interventions in these participants
Determine the mediating effect of potential cognitive-affective factors related to CRC screening in these participants
Investigate the comparative cost-effectiveness of these interventions to improve CRC screening adherence
OUTLINE This is a randomized study Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 screening arms
Arm I Participants are contacted by simple electronic communication methods by an email message linked to a personalized website
Arm II Participants are contacted by traditional print communication methods
Arm III Participants are observed usual care Participants in arms I and II are randomized a second time to receive messages about colorectal cancer screening that are matched or mismatched to their attentional style
PROJECTED ACCRUAL A total of 5000 participants will be accrued for this study
Compare traditional print versus simple electronic communication versus usual care in terms of increasing colorectal cancer CRC screening rates in average-risk women attending a routine OBGyn visit
Explore the moderating role of attentional style and background variables on the impact of the interventions in these participants
Determine the mediating effect of potential cognitive-affective factors related to CRC screening in these participants
Investigate the comparative cost-effectiveness of these interventions to improve CRC screening adherence
OUTLINE This is a randomized study Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 screening arms
Arm I Participants are contacted by simple electronic communication methods by an email message linked to a personalized website
Arm II Participants are contacted by traditional print communication methods
Arm III Participants are observed usual care Participants in arms I and II are randomized a second time to receive messages about colorectal cancer screening that are matched or mismatched to their attentional style
PROJECTED ACCRUAL A total of 5000 participants will be accrued for this study
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None
Secondary IDs
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01CA102695 | NIH | Fox Chase Cancer Center | httpsreporternihgovquickSearchR01CA102695 |
| IRB05-016 | OTHER | None | None |
| CDR0000538413 | REGISTRY | None | None |