Viewing Study NCT06664268


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:30 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:30 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06664268
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-10-29
First Post: 2024-10-17
Is Possible Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effect of PRF & Fractional CO2 Laser in Postburn Hypertrophic Scars
Sponsor: Assiut University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Clinical and Ultrasound Assessment of Efficacy of Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) Injection and Fractional CO2 Laser in Treatment of Postburn Hypertrophic Scars: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Recent advancements in scar management include the use of Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) injections and fractional CO2 laser treatments. Both modalities are considered innovative approaches that offer promising outcomes in scar revision .

Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) is a newer modality in regenerative medicine derived from the patient's own blood. Unlike platelet-rich plasma (PRP), PRF does not use anticoagulants during processing, leading to a natural fibrin matrix that supports prolonged release of growth factors and cytokines . This matrix has been shown to enhance wound healing and improve scar texture and appearance. Studies have demonstrated PRF's efficacy in treating various skin conditions, including acne scars and general skin rejuvenation, suggesting potential benefits for postburn scar management .

Fractional CO2 laser therapy is a well-established technique for scar treatment, including postburn scars. This technology utilizes laser energy to create microthermal zones in the skin, which stimulates collagen production and skin remodeling while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues . Clinical trials have validated the effectiveness of fractional CO2 lasers in reducing scar thickness and improving skin texture, making it a popular choice for scar revision .
Detailed Description: Postburn scars often result in significant functional and aesthetic challenges for plastic surgeons. These scars can cause physical limitations, psychological distress, and a decrease in quality of life. Traditional treatments, including topical therapies, silicone gel sheets, and surgical interventions, frequently fall short in providing optimal results, particularly for extensive or complex scars .

Recent advancements in scar management include the use of Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) injections and fractional CO2 laser treatments. Both modalities are considered innovative approaches that offer promising outcomes in scar revision .

Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) is a newer modality in regenerative medicine derived from the patient's own blood. Unlike platelet-rich plasma (PRP), PRF does not use anticoagulants during processing, leading to a natural fibrin matrix that supports prolonged release of growth factors and cytokines . This matrix has been shown to enhance wound healing and improve scar texture and appearance. Studies have demonstrated PRF's efficacy in treating various skin conditions, including acne scars and general skin rejuvenation, suggesting potential benefits for postburn scar management .

Fractional CO2 laser therapy is a well-established technique for scar treatment, including postburn scars. This technology utilizes laser energy to create microthermal zones in the skin, which stimulates collagen production and skin remodeling while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues . Clinical trials have validated the effectiveness of fractional CO2 lasers in reducing scar thickness and improving skin texture, making it a popular choice for scar revision .

Despite the individual benefits of PRF and fractional CO2 laser treatments, there is a lack of direct comparative studies assessing their relative efficacy in postburn scar management. Comparative research is essential to determine which treatment provides superior outcomes and to guide clinical decision-making .

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: