Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:38 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04348357
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-07-07
First Post:
2020-04-07
Is Possible Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care
Sponsor:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care Following Minimally-invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Telemedicine
Brief Summary:
The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Detailed Description:
Project title: Utilizing telemedicine for delivery of postoperative care following minimally-invasive gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
Principal Investigator: Steven Radtke MD FACOG Co-Investigators: Randle Umeh MD Research Associate: Martha Chavez, MPA Biostatistician: Zuber Mulla, Ph.D., Professor Affiliations: Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
Background:
The wide-spread use of minimally invasive techniques in gynecologic surgery has brought several tangible benefits to patients including faster-recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased risk of long term complications, to name a few. 1-3 Technological advances such as the development of robotic assistance have allowed to further expand the number of cases that can be performed via a minimally invasive approach.4 The shift has been such that the landscape regarding operative routes in gynecologic surgery has completely reversed, with now the majority of cases being performed laparoscopically. 5 Although much has changed intraoperatively, the surrounding structure of an operative has lagged. Specifically, preoperative and post-operative visits are still conducted in a similar way than how it was done 20 years ago. Despite leaps in technology, the field of gynecologic surgery has been slow to widely implement these advances into perioperative practice. One of the specific areas of opportunity is the postoperative visit. It is common practice in the majority of fields to have a visit with the patient approximately 2 weeks after surgery. The objective of this visit is to evaluate how the patient has been progressing, examine the wound site(s), and discuss pathology results from any specimens that were removed during the procedure.
The logistics of this visit involve blocking a time-slot in an established clinic day. The patient is required to transport herself to the clinic site. Once checked-in, there may be a waiting period before being placed in a room for the practitioner to conduct the visit. Once the visit is started, as long as there are no issues, the duration of the interaction may range on average between 3-7 minutes.
Despite these visits being short and usually straight-forward, the invested time that patients have to dedicate is substantially greater than the actual interaction with the clinician. Furthermore, because of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many patients have already returned to work by the time of the postoperative visit which may result in a disruption of their daily work schedule.
The ubiquitousness of high-speed internet and mobile phones have allowed for the field of telemedicine to thrive in recent years.6,7 Although wide-spread application of this modality has not been implemented in the field of gynecologic surgery, other areas such as urology and pediatrics have successfully implemented telemedicine programs, specifically for postoperative patients, yielding promising results. 8,9 The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Objectives
1. Determine if there are differences in patient satisfaction between traditional postoperative visits and telemedicine postoperative visits
2. Determine the difference in time invested from the patient's side and clinicians side in order to complete the postoperative visit interaction
3. Analyze if there is a difference between groups regarding visits to the emergency department related to the surgery, delayed postoperative complications, etc.
Hypothesis Patient satisfaction will be greater in the telemedicine group. The total time invested will be decreased. There will be no difference in visits to the emergency department or unrecognized postoperative complications
Principal Investigator: Steven Radtke MD FACOG Co-Investigators: Randle Umeh MD Research Associate: Martha Chavez, MPA Biostatistician: Zuber Mulla, Ph.D., Professor Affiliations: Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine
Background:
The wide-spread use of minimally invasive techniques in gynecologic surgery has brought several tangible benefits to patients including faster-recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased risk of long term complications, to name a few. 1-3 Technological advances such as the development of robotic assistance have allowed to further expand the number of cases that can be performed via a minimally invasive approach.4 The shift has been such that the landscape regarding operative routes in gynecologic surgery has completely reversed, with now the majority of cases being performed laparoscopically. 5 Although much has changed intraoperatively, the surrounding structure of an operative has lagged. Specifically, preoperative and post-operative visits are still conducted in a similar way than how it was done 20 years ago. Despite leaps in technology, the field of gynecologic surgery has been slow to widely implement these advances into perioperative practice. One of the specific areas of opportunity is the postoperative visit. It is common practice in the majority of fields to have a visit with the patient approximately 2 weeks after surgery. The objective of this visit is to evaluate how the patient has been progressing, examine the wound site(s), and discuss pathology results from any specimens that were removed during the procedure.
The logistics of this visit involve blocking a time-slot in an established clinic day. The patient is required to transport herself to the clinic site. Once checked-in, there may be a waiting period before being placed in a room for the practitioner to conduct the visit. Once the visit is started, as long as there are no issues, the duration of the interaction may range on average between 3-7 minutes.
Despite these visits being short and usually straight-forward, the invested time that patients have to dedicate is substantially greater than the actual interaction with the clinician. Furthermore, because of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many patients have already returned to work by the time of the postoperative visit which may result in a disruption of their daily work schedule.
The ubiquitousness of high-speed internet and mobile phones have allowed for the field of telemedicine to thrive in recent years.6,7 Although wide-spread application of this modality has not been implemented in the field of gynecologic surgery, other areas such as urology and pediatrics have successfully implemented telemedicine programs, specifically for postoperative patients, yielding promising results. 8,9 The investigators propose a pilot project in which enrolled patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery will be randomized to either a traditional office postoperative visit or a telemedicine postoperative visit. The two groups will then be compared on a variety of metrics including clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and time.
Objectives
1. Determine if there are differences in patient satisfaction between traditional postoperative visits and telemedicine postoperative visits
2. Determine the difference in time invested from the patient's side and clinicians side in order to complete the postoperative visit interaction
3. Analyze if there is a difference between groups regarding visits to the emergency department related to the surgery, delayed postoperative complications, etc.
Hypothesis Patient satisfaction will be greater in the telemedicine group. The total time invested will be decreased. There will be no difference in visits to the emergency department or unrecognized postoperative complications
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: