Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:39 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-04 @ 2:03 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02168257
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2017-07-21
First Post:
2014-06-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates
Sponsor:
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2017-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Lack of enrollment
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47575 | OTHER_GRANT | Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota IRGP | View |