Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:47 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 8:42 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06220357
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-01-23
First Post:
2024-01-14
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Diluted Indocyanine Green Angiography: a Novel Approach to Free Flap Perfusion Evaluation in Reconstructive Microsurgery
Sponsor:
Indonesia University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing Diluted to Standard Concentration Indocyanine Green Angiography: a Novel Approach to Free Flap Perfusion Evaluation in Reconstructive Microsurgery
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The evaluation of perfusion in free flaps is crucial in clinical practice. Currently, the gold standard for evaluation is subjective through clinical assessment. However, indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), a tool that uses a near-infrared (NIR) camera to depict and monitor flap vascularization, offers an objective and reproducible alternative. The population in this study were divided into three equal groups, where each groups were assessed with Indocyanine Green (Aurogreen®, Aurolab, Tamil Nadu, India). The study was conducted with three distinct concentrations of ICGA: 5 mg/mL (100% standard concentration), 2.5 mg/mL (50%), and 0.5 mg/mL (10%). Indocyanine green was given in immediate postoperative manner, after the patient defect has been reconstructed with free flap.
Detailed Description:
Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography is a novel technique for assessing tissue perfusion. The primary outcome is gray values that being evaluated with IMAGE. Through this study optimal concentration that will show fluorescence in NIR camera can be seen. This is important in order to evaluate free flap perfusion.
This study included 47 patients who underwent free flap surgery. The subjects were consisted of postoperative patient with fibular free flap (FFF), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), radial forearm free flap (RFFF), and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), with inclusion criteria of this study are individuals who have successfully undergone micro-reconstruction surgery utilizing a viable free flap, with no prior surgical intervention in the area under evaluation, and the donor area for the free flap is devoid of any history of trauma or surgery.
This study included 47 patients who underwent free flap surgery. The subjects were consisted of postoperative patient with fibular free flap (FFF), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), radial forearm free flap (RFFF), and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), with inclusion criteria of this study are individuals who have successfully undergone micro-reconstruction surgery utilizing a viable free flap, with no prior surgical intervention in the area under evaluation, and the donor area for the free flap is devoid of any history of trauma or surgery.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: