Viewing Study NCT01996657


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 6:47 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 11:07 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01996657
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2017-06-26
First Post: 2013-11-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: D-Dimer Determined Anticoagulation INTENSITY in Patients With Mechanical Valve Replacement
Sponsor: Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: D-dimer Levels Determined the Intensity of Anticoagulation Therapy to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Mechanical Valve Replacement
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2016-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: 3D-INTENSITY
Brief Summary: The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in China patients undergoing mechanical valve replacements is still controversial due to the different risk profiles of thrombophilia and bleeding in Chinese patients. Elevated D-dimer could reflect a pro-thrombogenic or prothrombotic state, and thus might be used to decide the intensity of oral anticoagulation.

This study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels could help to determine the intensity of oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses.
Detailed Description: Background: The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation in China patients undergoing mechanical valve replacements is still controversial due to the different risk profiles of thrombophilia and bleeding in Chinese patients. Elevated D-dimer could reflect a pro-thrombogenic or prothrombotic state, and thus might be used to decide the intensity of oral anticoagulation.

Objective: This study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels could help to determine the intensity of oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Methods: A single-center, prospective study was performed. 748 Patients with mechanical valve replacement who had received oral anticoagulation. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups The intensity of anticoagulation for group one was standard intensity (INR:2.5-3.5). The intensity of anticoagulation for group two was kept at low intensity without adjustment (INR:1.8-2.6), and for group three , The intensity of anticoagulation maintained at low level initiatively (INR:1.8-2.6), D-dimer testing were analyzed two times at 3 month later. In case of D-dimer level elevated, adjusted the intensity of anticoagulation to standard level. The endpoint of the study was the subsequent thromboembolic and major bleeding during an average follow-up of 2 years.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: